| |
Letter to the Editor
High fever swine disease
impacts in Asia
We write to inform our fellow AASV members of the current
knowledge and opinions concerning a serious disease outbreak in
mainland China, known locally as porcine high fever disease (PHFD).
At least 23 provinces of China have been affected, including the
peri-urban commercial farm sectors around Guangzhou, Shanghai, and
Beijing, totaling about 300 million pigs. The vast extent of the
outbreaks across the country and the impact on affected farms has
made PHFD a major political issue, as these factors have apparently
led directly to reductions in pig supply and hence rises in pork
prices, additional to those due to rising input prices,
particularly of feedstuffs. Different China-based media report
400,000 to over 100 million deaths during 2006 to mid-2007.
Supermarket pork prices in eastern China rose from around $1 to
$2.50 per kg (US$) between 2005 and mid-2007. Because China boasts
a huge pig population of about 500 million, economic considerations
suggest that the higher mortality figures may be more accurate. A
farm outbreak is now viewed as a notifiable disease situation by
China Ministry of Agriculture authorities, with imposition of
quarantine, movement restrictions, and subsidized on-farm
interventions. A budget of 3.8 billion yuan (approximately US$502
million) was allocated in mid-2007 for a pig-farmer support scheme,
including free farm and sow insurance, pig transport, and
vaccinations.1
China was recently the world’s 5th largest
exporter of pork. The relatively unknown health status of Chinese
pigs, occurrence of viral diseases such as classical swine fever
(CSF) and foot-and-mouth disease (thought to exist widely but
largely undeclared publicly) and now PHFD, are important issues for
potential importers.
Representative cases of PHFD show high fever (40°C to 42°C),
blotchy congested spots, and rashes, especially over the ears,
face, and inner thighs. Pigs are depressed, anorexic, and lethargic
and occasionally cough; pregnant sows abort. The disease course is
usually 5 to 20 days. Many pigs die: the case fatality rate is
estimated at 20%, with deaths occurring both in sick and apparently
well-grown finishers and adult pigs. Pigs with PHFD are highly
contagious – the whole adjacent pig population is generally
affected within 3 to 5 days – so an affected farm faces a
massive and sudden outbreak with major economic consequences.
Mortality rates of up to 80% have been reported in rural pig-farm
groups. Necropsy reveals widespread hemorrhages and edema in
multiple organs, diffuse lung edema, diffuse petechiae in the
kidneys, splenic infarcts, and hemorrhages into the bladder wall
and local lymph nodes.
There is some dispute about the exact etiology of PHFD. Reliable
first-hand reports and necropsy findings suggest co-infection by
American-origin strains of porcine reproductive and respiratory
syndrome virus (PRRSV) and virulent CSF virus. On many farms, other
agents are likely to be involved, such as porcine circovirus type 2
genotype 2b and secondary bacteria. Classical swine fever may be
very difficult to control, even with availability of excellent
high-potency vaccines, due to maternal antibody interference with
vaccinal uptake and early periweaning infection. In contrast to
this suggested involvement of virulent CSF, Chinese
government-backed presentations and articles have focused on the
theory that PHFD and its high mortality are caused exclusively and
primarily by a mutant atypical and highly pathogenic PRRSV strain
spreading across China. Dr Gao’s laboratory in the Chinese
Academy of Sciences in Beijing has produced a whole-genome sequence
of this mutant PRRSV, which has a 30-amino-acid deletion in the
NSP2 region.2 However, mutations and deletions in the
NSP2 region are also frequently noted in American strains of
PRRSV.3 Whether any of these mutant strains in China (or
the United States) can now initiate a high mortality syndrome
without an accompanying pathogenic CSF infection and its
accompanying immunosuppression and other deleterious effects
requires independent verification. The concept of atypical PRRSV
strains capable of causing deaths in adult pigs as part of an
emerging disease has been disputed in past outbreaks of
high-mortality syndromes in the United States,4 but the
China situation suggests watchfulness is required. The
Chinese-government-sponsored focus on a mutant PRRSV etiology for
PHFD is consistent with the overall aim of enhancing international
perceptions of pig farming in China, as it minimizes the possible
involvement of undeclared, pathogenic CSF strains.
Pork accounts for 70% of meat consumption and 4% of the consumer
price index in China. It is likely that PHFD-induced price rises
have had a direct social impact, as the annual inflation rate has
risen above the benchmark 3%. The very high costs of the PHFD
outbreaks to pig farmers and wider Chinese society has therefore
directly impacted the key Chinese government policies of enhanced
rural employment, social cohesion, and food security. This prompted
the premier of China, Wen Jiabao, to linger reassuringly and
publicly at a supermarket pork counter in Xian on May 26, 2007. One
can only hope that more world leaders will follow his example of
personal time investment in the commercial pig industry.
-- Steven McOrist
-- Stanley Done
School of Veterinary Medicine and Science University of
Nottingham; Sutton Bonington, England
References
1. People’s Daily Online. Chinese government to allocate
6.5 billion yuan to tether pork prices. June 23, 2007. Available
at: http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200706/24/eng20070624_387168.html.
Accessed 30 August 2007.
2. Tian K, Yu X, Zhao T, Feng Y, Cao Z ,Wang C, Hu Y, Chen X, Hu
D, Tian X, Liu D, Zhang S, Deng X, Ding Y, Yang L, Zhang Y, Xias H,
Giao M, Wang B, Hou L, Wang X, Yang X, Kang L, Sun M, Jin P, Wang
S, Kitamura Y, Yan J, Gao G. Emergence of fatal PRRSV variants:
Unparalleled outbreaks of atypical PRRS in China and molecular
dissection of the unique hallmark. PLoS ONE [serial online].
Published June 13, 2007. http://www.plosome.org. Accessed 2 September 2007.
3. Han J, Wang Y, Faaberg KS. Complete genome analysis of RFLP
184 isolates of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome
virus. Vir Res. 2006;122:175–182.
4. Hurd HS, Bush EJ, Losinger W, Corso B, Zimmerman JJ, Wills R,
Swenson S, Pyburn D, Yeske P, Burkgren T. Outbreaks of porcine
reproductive failure: Report on a collaborative field investigation
[published corrections appear in J Swine Health Prod.
2001;9:154]. J Swine Health Prod. 2001;9:103–108.
|
|