| |
A cluster of farms experiencing
severe porcine circovirus associated disease: Clinical features and association
with the PCV2b genotype
Un grupo de granjas
que experimentaron enfermedad severa asociada a circovirus porcino: Características
clínicas y asociación con el genotipo PCV2b
Maladie sévère
associée au circovirus dans un regroupement de fermes: Caractéristiques
cliniques et association avec le génotype PCV2b
Kyle P. Horlen,
DVM; Paula Schneider; Joseph Anderson; Jerome C. Nietfeld, DVM, MS, PhD,
Diplomate ACVP; Steven C. Henry, DVM, Diplomate ABVP; Lisa M. Tokach, DVM,
Diplomate ABVP; Raymond R. R. Rowland, MA, PhD
KPH, PS, JA, JCN,
RRRR: Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary
Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas. SCH, LMT: Abilene Animal
Hospital, PA, Abilene, Kansas. Corresponding author: Dr Kyle P. Horlen,
Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, 1800 Denison Ave K-212, Manhattan,
KS 66506–5601; Tel: 785–532–4855; Fax: 785–532–4039;
E-mail: horlen.dvm@gmail.com
Cite as: Horlen
KP, Schneider P, Anderson J, et al. A cluster of farms experiencing severe
porcine circovirus associated disease: Clinical features and association
with the PCV2b genotype. J Swine Health Prod. 2007;15(5):270–278.
Also
available as a PDF.
Summary
The objective of this study was to characterize the clinical, histopathological,
and virological features of an outbreak of severe porcine circovirus associated
disease (PCVAD) on four farms located in the same geographical region of Kansas.
The outbreak of PCVAD was evident by increased mortality and the appearance
of postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome, porcine dermatitis and nephropathy
syndrome, and neurological signs. Whole porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) genomes
were derived by sequencing polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products amplified
from tissues. Nucleotide differences between North American and European isolates
were used to construct a genotype-specific PCR assay for detection of different
genotypes. Genetic sequencing of PCV2 from 12 PCVAD-affected pigs showed that
all viruses were associated with the PCV2b genotype and were distant from historical
PCV2a isolates. Routine virus isolation from tissues of PCVAD-affected pigs
yielded both PCV2a and PCV2b viruses, as well as a porcine teschovirus.The
identification of PCV2b in Kansas is consistent with the increased incidence
of both severe PCVAD and variant PCV2 genotypes worldwide. The ultimate source
of the PCV2b virus within the production systems studied remains unclear. Genotype-specific
PCR assays provide new tools for understanding the contributions of PCV2a and
PCV2b viruses to PCVAD.
| Resumen
El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar las características clínicas,
histopatológicas, y virológicas de un brote de enfermedad severa
asociada a circovirus porcino (PCVAD por sus siglas en ingles) en cuatro granjas
localizadas en la misma región geográfica de Kansas. El brote
de PCVAD fue evidente por el aumento de mortalidad y la aparición del
síndrome de desgaste multisistémico post destete, dermatitis
porcina y síndrome de neuropatía, y signos neurológicos.
Los genomas completos del circovirus porcino tipo 2 (PCV2 por sus siglas en
inglés) se derivaron de la secuenciación de la amplificación
de los productos de la reacción en cadena de la polimerasa (PCR por
sus siglas en inglés) de tejidos. Se utilizaron las diferencias entre
los aislamientos Norteamericanos y Europeos para construir un PCR específico
de genotipo para la detección de los diferentes genotipos. Las secuencias
del PCV2 de los 12 cerdos afectados con el PCVAD demostraron que todos los
virus estaban asociados al genotipo PCV2b y que eran distantes del aislamiento
PCV2a. El aislamiento rutinario de tejidos de cerdos afectados con PDCAV mostraron
los dos genotipos PCV2a y PCV2b asi como el virus tescho de puercos. La identificación
de PCV2b in Kansas es consistente con el incremento de la incidencia severa
del os dos PCVAD genotipos y la variante del genotipo PCV2 a nivel mundial..
La fuente del PCV2b en el sistema de producción permanece desconocida.
El PCR específico de genotipo provee una herramienta novedosa para entender
la contribución del PCV2a y PCV2b en la PCVAD.
| Resumé
L’objectif de la présente étude était de déterminer
les caractéristiques cliniques, histopathologiques, et virologiques
d’une poussée de cas sévères de maladie associée
au circovirus porcin (PCVAD) sur quatre fermes localisées dans la même
région géographique du Kansas. La poussée de cas était
manifeste par une augmentation de la mortalité et l’apparence
d’un syndrome de dépérissement multi-systémique
post-sevrage, de dermatite porcine et d’un syndrome néphropatique,
de même que de signes neurologiques. Le génome entier des circovirus
de type 2 (PCV2) a été déduit en séquençant
les produits des réactions d’amplification en chaîne (PCR)
effectuées à partir des tissus. Des différences dans les
séquences nucléotidiques entre les isolats nord-américains
et européens ont été utilisées afin de construire
une épreuve PCR spécifique de génotype afin de détecter
les différents génotypes. Le séquençage génétique
du PCV2 provenant de 12 porcs affectés par le PCVAD a démontré que
tous les virus
étaient associés avec le génotype PCV2b et étaient
distants de l’isolat PCV2a historique. L’isolement viral de routine
à partir des tissus de porcs affectés par PCVAD a permis d’obtenir
les virus PCV2a et PCV2b, de même que qu’un teschovirus porcin.
L’identification de PCV2b au Kansas est en accord avec l’augmentation
d’incidence de PCVAD sévère et de variants génotypiques
de PCV2 à travers le monde. La source ultime de PCV2b à l’intérieur
des systèmes de production étudiés n’est pas clairement établie.
Des essais de PCR spécifiques de génotype fournissent de nouveaux
outils pour comprendre les contributions de PCV2a et PCV2b au PCVAD.
|
Keywords: swine, porcine
circovirus associated disease, porcine circovirus type 2, PCV, polymerase
chain reaction, PCR, porcine teschovirus
Search the AASV web site
for pages with similar keywords.
Received: July
25, 2006
Accepted: March
22, 2007
Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) is a small nonenveloped DNA
virus with a single-stranded circular genome and is assigned to the
family Circoviridae.1 Porcine circovirus type 2 is
recognized as the primary etiological agent associated with a group
of complex multi-factorial diseases classified as porcine
circovirus associated disease (PCVAD), of which postweaning
multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) and porcine dermatitis and
nephropathy syndrome (PDNS) are major syndromes.2
Postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome was described in 1997 as
a new disease seen in several high-health herds in western
Canada3 and has become a growing concern in the swine
industry throughout the world.4
Although it is now recognized in many pig-producing countries,
the etiology of PDNS remains unclear. Porcine circovirus type 2 has
been implicated as the causative agent, but the simple presence of
PCV2 in most animals affected with PDNS is not conclusive proof of
pathogenesis. However, the pathological changes of PDNS are
consistent with an immune-complex disorder, and it has been
hypothesized that extremely high PCV2 serum antibody titers and
immune-complex deposition are a significant factor for
disease.5 Phylogenetic analyses of PCV2 open reading
frame 2 (ORF2) gene sequences show branches that are identified
within different geographic regions.6,7 The virus
strains of recent interest are those that are identified as PCV2a
and PCV2b. The terminology “PCV2a” and
“PCV2b” is based upon whether the isolated virus is
more similar to historical North American isolates
(“a”) or European isolates (“b”). On the
basis of restriction endonuclease digestion, most PCV2 genotypes in
the United States can be further described by the restriction
fragment length polymorphism patterns 4–2–2
(PCV2–422 genotype) and 3–2–1 (PCV2–321
genotype), which, with some exceptions, correspond to strains PCV2a
and PCV2b, respectively. Historically, PCVAD cases in the United
States have been associated with viruses possessing the 422
genotype.8 Recent cases of PCVAD in Canada are linked to
the emergence of the 321 genotype, which shows close similarities
to certain PCV2b isolates, such as a 1998 French isolate (GenBank
AF055393).8,9
The interactions between PCV2 and other factors, including
infectious agents, are well documented. Both porcine parvovirus
(PPV) and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS)
virus are considered cofactors in the development of
PMWS.10,11 Additionally, bacteria such as Mycoplasma
hyopneumoniae have been shown to increase the severity of
clinical signs in a manner similar to PPV and PRRS
virus.12 It is likely that numerous other infectious
cofactors are involved in the etiology of PCVAD.
In this study, we identified four herds within the same
geographical region of Kansas that were experiencing severe PCVAD.
The term “severe” was used as a means to describe this
outbreak as not only meeting the criteria of Sorden’s
definition13 of PMWS, but also exhibiting a dramatic
increase in the morbidity and mortality of growing pigs.
Furthermore, severe PCVAD was observed in both serologically
PRRS-negative and PRRS-positive herds and included some clinical
signs not typically associated with PMWS or PDNS. The purpose of
this study was to characterize the clinical, pathological, and
virological features of an outbreak of severe PCVAD in Kansas,
including the genotypic properties of PCV2 isolates recovered from
affected and nonaffected pigs, possible sources of PCV2 in a
production system, and the identity of other viral cofactors
responsible for atypical clinical signs.
Case description
Herd history
In Kansas, the first clinical recognition of severe PCVAD
occurred in November 2005, affecting four separate finisher
operations located in the northeastern part of the state. For the
purpose of convenience, we labeled these sites Farms A, B, C, and
D. As shown in Figure 1, Herds A and B were PRRS-positive
multi-site farrow-to-finish operations. Herds C and D were
PRRS-negative, and served as nursery and finisher sites for weaned
pigs from Herd E, a PRRS-negative sow farm. The PRRS status of each
farm had been determined by routine monitoring for the presence of
PRRS virus antibody using a standard PRRS ELISA (Idexx, Westbrook,
Maine). Herds A and E received replacement gilts as weaned piglets
from Herd F, a PRRS-negative multiplier, and semen from Herd G.
Thus, the genetic source of Herds A, C, and D was the same. Herd B
received animals from a different boar stud and gilt multiplier.
Additionally, a fifth herd in the same area was investigated as
possibly experiencing an outbreak of severe PCVAD following reports
of increased morbidity and mortality. However, extensive
investigation of several animals revealed no evidence of PCVAD
despite the isolation of PCV2 from two pigs. Finally, a small
farrow-to-finish herd that received semen from Farm G was
investigated as experiencing severe PCVAD. Following confirmation
of clinical signs and histopathologic lesions, samples from this
farm, as well as samples from Farms A through D, were used to
evaluate a set of differential PCV2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
primers. All farms were considered to be of overall good health
with minimal incidence of common pathogens such as swine influenza
virus, Lawsonia intracellularis, and Mycoplasma
hypneumoniae prior to the study investigation. For the
initial investigation, approximately 20 pigs were sampled per
site.
| Figure 1: Source and distribution flow chart in
a study of severe porcine circovirus associated disease (PCVAD) in four
separate finishers in the same geographical area. The gray boxes indicate
farm sites where PCVAD-positive pigs were found. White boxes identify the
sources of the affected pigs. Asterisks identify herds seropositive for
porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome.

|
Clinical and pathological features of pigs from the four Kansas
farms
The first indication of a problem in herds A through D was the
appearance of increased morbidity and mortality during finishing.
Pigs entered the finisher at 9 to 10 weeks of age. Historically,
mortality in these herds ranged from 3% to 5% during the finishing
period, but had suddenly increased to as much as 15%. An example of
the mortality profile for Farm A is presented in Figure 2.
Detection of clinical signs and increased mortality led to an
in-depth investigation at each farm. Most affected pigs could be
placed into one of two groups. Pigs in one group had clinical signs
and pathologic lesions compatible with PMWS, and pigs in the second
group had clinical signs and pathologic lesions compatible with
PDNS.
| Figure 2: Mortality in Herd A by week post placement.
The data include 6356 pigs in five PCVAD-affected lots. The dotted line
shows the historic mortality, which averaged 0.2% deaths per week.

|
Pigs in the PMWS group were noticeably smaller than their
penmates and had long rough hair coats. At necropsy, the
submandibular, inguinal, and bronchial lymph nodes were swollen.
The lungs were wet and did not fully collapse, and, in most cases,
there were areas of anterior-ventral pulmonary consolidation
compatible with bacterial bronchopneumonia. A few pigs were icteric
and their livers were slightly nodular and firmer than normal when
incised. Microscopically, lymphocytes in germinal centers of the
lymph nodes and tonsils and in the periarterial lymphatic sheaths
of the spleen were consistently replaced by large macrophage-like
cells and occasional multinucleated giant cells. In addition, in
many pigs, lymphocytes in the paracortical areas of the lymph nodes
and tonsil were also replaced by large macrophage-like or stromal
cells. In areas of the lung without bronchopneumonia, there were
interstitial infiltrates of macrophages and lymphocytes. This
interstitial pneumonia was more severe in serologically
PRRS-positive pigs. The kidneys typically contained multifocal,
coalescing interstitial infiltrates of lymphocytes and plasma
cells. In a few kidneys, multiple areas also contained large
numbers of macrophages. Some tubules contained sloughed and
fragmented cells. In the livers from the icteric pigs, there were
multiple foci of necrosis, chronic inflammation, and portal
fibrosis. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for PCV2 consistently
revealed abundant antigen in the cytoplasm of macrophage-like cells
in lymph nodes, tonsils, and spleen. In parenchymal organs, such as
the lung, kidney, and liver, there was PCV2 antigen in macrophages
and the nuclei of many epithelial cells, with positive staining
present in almost all lungs and a minority of livers and
kidneys.
Pigs in the PDNS group were in good body condition but had
discrete red to purple to black papules involving the rear limbs,
or large purple to black areas of epidermal discoloration over the
entire body, or both. The inguinal lymph nodes were consistently
markedly enlarged and hemorrhagic. The pleural and peritoneal
cavities contained watery fluid (less than 1.0 L each) and the
kidneys were swollen, wet, and usually had pinpoint hemorrhages
covering the capsule. In several pigs, the spleen contained raised
infarcts that measured approximately 1.0 to 2.5 cm in diameter.
Microscopically, the kidneys’ glomeruli were swollen and
filled with fibrin, and there was necrosis of the glomerular tufts.
In most cases, all glomeruli were involved, but in a few pigs, less
than half of the glomeruli were visibly damaged. Large numbers of
tubules were filled with protein, hemoglobin, erythrocytes, and
cellular detritus. In most kidneys, the glomerular lesions were
acute, but in a few pigs the lesions were chronic, with the fibrin
in glomeruli organized by fibroblast-like cells. Commonly, there
also was extensive interstitial inflammation consisting primarily
of lymphocytes and plasma cells and, in some cases, small
infiltrates of neutrophils, with the inflammation being
predominately in the medulla. In most kidneys, there was fibrinoid
necrosis and perivascular cuffing of small and medium-sized
arteries by lymphocytes and plasma cells. In sections of discolored
skin there was acute coagulative necrosis of the epidermis with
edema, hemorrhage, neutrophilic and eosinophilic inflammation, and
vascular necrosis in the dermis. In the spleens of most pigs with
PDNS, there were scattered arteries with fibrinoid necrosis. In a
few instances, the necrotic arteries were surrounded by microscopic
to macroscopic areas of coagulative necrosis. Follicles in lymph
nodes and tonsils contained groups of large epitheloid macrophages
and occasional multinucleated giant cells. In some lymph nodes,
focal areas of coagulative necrosis, some of which contained
mineral, appeared to involve follicles. The medullary and
trabecular sinuses of many nodes were filled with hemorrhage and
neutrophils. Fibrinoid necrosis of arteries was also present in
rare sections of lymph nodes, the epicardium, and the capsule of
the adrenal gland. Immunohistochemical staining revealed small
amounts of PCV2 antigen in macrophages in follicles of the lymph
nodes and tonsil of most pigs. Rare sections of kidney were
IHC-positive for PCV2, and all sections of skin were IHC-negative.
In a few cases, all tissues were IHC-negative for PCV2.
In three of the four affected herds, numerous pigs had rectal
prolapse and weakness in the rear legs. Nonsuppurative inflammation
was observed in the brains and spinal cords of these pigs, but IHC
staining for PCV2 was negative.
Diagnostic investigation
Whole PCV2 genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis
Whole-genome PCV2 sequences were obtained from 12 PCVAD-affected
pigs from the four affected farms. One gram of lung and lymph node
tissue was homogenized in 10 mL of minimum essential medium (MEM)
and tissue debris was removed by centrifugation. Total DNA was
isolated from the clarified medium using a QIAamp DNA blood mini
kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California). Polymerase chain reaction and
DNA sequencing of whole PCV2 genomes was performed according to
published protocols.6 Two overlapping segments were
amplified using primer pairs CV1F
1336–5’AGGGCTGTGGCCTTTGTTAC and CV2R
536–5’TCTTCCAATCACGCTTCTGC, respectively, and CV3F
453–5’TGGTGACCGTTGCAGAGCAG and CV4R 1525–5’
TGGGCGGTGGACATGATGAG, respectively. The reaction mixture included
the DNA template, 1× PCR buffer, 1.25 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each
deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate, 0.2 uM each primer, and 2.5 U Taq
polymerase. Polymerase chain reaction conditions were one cycle at
95°C for 4 minutes followed by 40 cycles at 93°C for 45 seconds,
50°C for 45 seconds, and 72°C for 90 seconds. At the end, the
reaction was incubated at 72°C for 10 minutes. Deoxyribonucleic
acid sequences were determined using the PCR products, the relevant
primer sets, and a sequencing kit from Beckman-Coulter (Fullerton,
California). Analyses were performed on a Beckman-Coulter CEQ 8000
sequencer. Prior to sequencing, the PCR products were purified
using a Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega, Madison,
Wisconsin). Analysis of the sequence chromatograms and assembly of
the sequences were performed using several computer-based programs,
including 4-Peaks (Mekentosj, Amsterdam, Netherlands), Vector NTI
(Invitrogen, Calsbad, California), Clustal-X (Statsbourg
Bioinformatics, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France), and Gene Jockey II
(Biosoft, Cambridge, United Kingdom). Phylogenetic trees were
constructed using the whole 1768 nucleotide genome for each
isolate. Sequences were aligned using Clustal-X. The unrooted
phylogram was generated by a neighbor-joining method using Mega
(Biodesign Institute, Tempe, Arizona).14
Within the phylogenetic tree, all 12 sequences formed a single
group, which was located near the 1998 French PCV2b isolate,
AF0553939 (Figure 3). This group of sequences was
approximately 99.5% identical to AF055393. Sequences from a given
farm tended to cluster together into the same sub-branch. A fifth
herd located in the same general area was investigated as possibly
experiencing an outbreak of PCVAD; however, even though the
affected pigs were PCR-positive for PCV2, histopathology showed no
evidence of PCVAD. Two PCV2 isolates were sequenced from two
non-affected Kansas pigs. The sequences, identified as 804-SF and
804-SP in Figure 3, localized near other historical North American
strains such as the PCV2a isolate AF055391. Sequences 804-SF and
804-SP were well separated from the PCV2 sequences of other Kansas
PCVAD-affected pigs. The 12 Kansas PCV2 sequences isolated from
PCVAD-affected pigs were only approximately 94% identical to
AF055391. Differences at the nucleotide level translate into amino
acid differences. Analysis of a
representative PCV2b Kansas isolate and the Kansas PCV2a isolate
(804-SF) revealed 12 amino acid differences, which were located
between amino acids 57 to 91 and 151 to 210. Seven of the amino
acid changes were nonconserved.
| Figure 3: Phylogenetic analysis of Kansas porcine
circovirus type 2 (PCV2) isolates in an outbreak of severe porcine circovirus
associated disease (PCVAD) on four Kansas finishers. An unrooted phylogram
shows locations of PCV2 isolates. The upper box shows isolates from Herds
A through D. Note the location of the French isolate, AF055393, and Canadian
isolate FMV05–6302. The lower box shows locations of two Kansas PCV2
isolates, 804-SP and 804-SF, from pigs showing no histological evidence
of PCVAD. Other isolates, identified by GenBank numbers, represent typical
American and Canadian isolates.

|
Selective PCR amplification of PCV2a and PCV2b genotypes in
clinical samples
Utilizing genetic sequences unique to either PCV2a or PCV2b
viruses, we designed genotype-specific primers that could be used
to rapidly identify the different genotypes in tissues. As shown in
Figure 4A, both primer sets contained the same forward primer, but
different reverse primers. The original PCV2a-specific PCR-specific
assay was performed according to Kim et al.15
Deoxyribonucleic acid was amplified using 35 cycles at 94°C for 30
seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 60 seconds, followed by
a 10-minute extension at 72°C. The PCR products were
electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel and visualized under UV light
after staining with ethidium bromide. Each run included positive
and negative controls.
| Figure 4: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification
of two genotypes of porcine circovirus (PCV), PCV2a and PCV2b, in clinical
samples from a severe outbreak of porcine circovirus associated disease
(PCVAD) in four finishers in Kansas. A: Primers used to amplify PCV2a and
PCV2b genotypes; B: PCR results for seven boars from Herd G, with none
positive for PCV2b; C: PCR results for two pools (P1 and P2, three pigs/pool)
containing lymph node and lung tissue from pigs with severe PCVAD. Both
P1 and P2 were positive only for PCV2b; D: PCV2 screening of eight virus
isolates from pigs from Farms A through D with severe PCVAD, showing five
isolates positive for both PCV2a and PCV2b. In all frames,
“M” is a 1KB DNA marker, “+” is a positive control
of cloned template of PCV2a or PCV2b, and “-”
is a negative control.

|
Since PCV2 has been shown to be present in semen,16
the boar stud provides a logical source for the dissemination of
new PCV2 strains. We sought to determine if the boar stud,
identified as Farm G in Figure 1, could be the source of the PCV2b
virus in Farms A, C, and D. Farm G contained approximately 300
boars with replacements sourced from two US farms. There was no
evidence of PCVAD in the boar stud. Seven boars from Farm G, culled
because of poor semen production, were removed and necropsied.
Gross and microscopic analysis of lungs, lymph nodes, and kidneys
confirmed that all boars were negative for PMWS and PDNS, and
therefore, considered negative for PCVAD. Polymerase chain reaction
amplification of lung and lymph node homogenates was performed
using the PCV2a-specific and PCV2b-specific primers. The PCR
results, presented in Figure 4B, showed that six of the seven boars
were positive for PCV2a. However, all boars tested were negative
for PCV2b. The PCR products were sequenced to confirm the presence
of only PCV2a DNA. In contrast, PCR of pooled tissues from six
PCVAD-affected pigs from a farm that received semen from Farm G
showed no evidence of PCV2a sequence, but were positive for PCV2b
(Figure 4C). These results, along with Figure 3, support the
association of PCV2b with PCVAD-affected pigs, but fail to identify
the boar stud as the PCV2b source.
We also used the PCV2a and PCV2b primers to amplify DNA from
eight PCV2 isolates obtained by virus isolation from tissues of
pigs that had originated from Farms A through D and that were
severely affected with PCVAD. Isolation of PCV2 was performed on
monolayers of rapidly dividing swine testicular (ST) cells
(approximately 50% confluent). Cells were maintained in MEM
supplemented with 7% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics
(penicillin, streptomycin, amphotericin B, and ciprofloxacin).
Monolayers were incubated with different dilutions of clarified
homogenates prepared from lung, lymph node, and kidney collected
from affected pigs. After 3 days, the media containing the virus
was removed and stored at -80°C. To detect the presence of virus,
monolayers were fixed in 80% aqueous acetone and stained with
FITC-labeled porcine anti-PCV2 antibody (VMRD, Pullman,
Washington). Cells were incubated with antibody for 1 hour,
extensively washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS),
counterstained with Evans blue, and then viewed under a
fluorescence microscope. Polymerase chain reaction analysis
revealed that all isolates were positive for PCV2b. Interestingly,
five of the isolates were positive for both PCV2a and PCV2b (Figure
4D). Whole-genome sequences, obtained using the method described
for Figure 3, showed only the presence of PCV2b sequence.
Detection of porcine teschovirus (PTV) and porcine enterovirus
(PEV)
Several of the PCVAD-affected pigs had neurological lesions that
were not associated with the presence of PCV2 antigen. One
possibility was that lesions were the result of a PTV or PEV
infection. Polymerase chain reaction to detect PTV and PEV was
performed according to the technique described by Palmquist et
al.17 Total RNA was extracted from tissue homogenates
composed of lung, lymph node, and spinal cord using a Qiagen
RNAeasy kit (Valencia, California). Reverse transcriptase PCR was
performed using a Qiagen One Step RT-PCR kit, according to the
manufacturer’s recommendations. Forward and reverse primers
were PTV-F 5’GTGGCGACAGGGTACAGAAGAG and PTV-R
5’GGCCAGCCGCGACCCTGTCAG, respectively. The PCR reaction
conditions were 40 cycles at 94°C for 60 seconds, 56°C for 60
seconds, and 72°C for 60 seconds, followed by a 10-minute extension
at 72°C. The PCR primers are designed to yield a 163-bp product for
PTV and a 180-bp product for PEV.
Amplification of RNA from tissues of PCVAD-affected animals
identified a 163-bp product in almost all pigs. Rarely, we found
both PTV and PEV PCR products, but never the 180-bp PEV product
alone. The PTV product was also obtained from tissues of pigs that
showed no clinical or histological evidence of PCVAD. A PTV was
isolated on ST cells from lung, lymph node, and spinal cord tissue
homogenate of a PCVAD-affected pig on Farm C. To further subtype
the PTV, we completed a second PCR reaction incorporating the
degenerate forward and reverse primers, 2163F
5-GGCAATGCAAGGYCATTATGT and 2746R
5’AGCCCRCAYCTCADRTARGTGGCATG, respectively, under
amplification conditions as described above. The PCR product was
sequenced and then compared with known PTV sequences from GenBank.
Analysis of this PTV sequence revealed that it is most closely
related to a group of PTV-6 isolates.
Discussion
Severe PCVAD in a group of Kansas herds is a disease problem not
previously encountered in this region. The isolation of PCV2
isolates from PCVAD-affected pigs that were clearly distinct from
historical US isolates indicates that PCVAD-associated PCV2
isolates on Farms A through D clearly belonged to the PCV2b
genotype. Since we have no historical information on PCV2 sequences
in the four Kansas herds prior to the first appearance of PCVAD, we
cannot determine the temporal association between the introduction
of PCV2b and the current PCVAD outbreak. Interestingly, the data
that has emerged from the study of the Kansas herds paints a
picture similar to data reported from Canada that links
PCV2–321 with the increased incidence and severity of PCVAD.
For example, the Animal Health Laboratory at the University of
Guelph in Ontario, Canada, reported only one case of
PCV2–321-associated PCVAD in 2004, whereas 135 cases were
reported in 2005.18 Furthermore, the increased incidence
of PCV2–321 is associated with an overall increase of PCVAD
in Canada.19 When Kansas PCV2b isolates are compared to
Canadian isolate FMV05–6302,20 greater than 99%
similarity is noted.
Reasons for the association of PCV2b with increased severity of
clinical disease are unclear. One possibility is that the PCV2b
genotype possesses greater virulence, or perhaps, the PCV2b virus
can escape existing herd immunity stimulated by previously
circulating PCV2a strains. The 233 amino-acid capsid protein of
PCV2 is translated from ORF2. Bioinformatic and structural analysis
of the PCV2 genome and proteins indicate that the capsid protein is
the principal component of the outer viral capsid, which interacts
with the cell receptor on host cells and stimulates protective
immunity.21,22 Current PCV2 vaccines are based on
stimulating anti-capsid immunity. Analysis of the amino acid
differences between representative Kansas PCV2a and PCV2b isolates
revealed several potentially significant amino-acid differences.
These data indicate that the nucleotide differences between the
Kansas PCV2a and PCV2b viruses may translate into significant
immunological and functional differences between the PCV2a and
PCV2b capsid proteins. Experiments are currently underway to test
the disease potential of the Kansas PCV2b isolates. Although we
failed to identify a PCVAD-affected pig infected with PCV2a alone,
it is likely that virulent strains do exist.
Although the focus of this paper is the association of PCV2b
with severe PCVAD, PCV2b may also be present in pigs not affected
by disease. Since three of the four affected farms received semen
from the same source, we originally believed that the boar stud was
the most logical source of the PCV2b genotype. However, analysis of
a small number of healthy boars showed only the PCV2a genotype.
Collectively, these data suggest that healthy boars can be a source
of PCV2a. Additionally, even though PCV2b sequence was not found in
the analysis of tissues from seven boars, we cannot rule out the
possibility that boar studs are also harboring the PCV2b virus.
However, the ability of the boars to shed PCV2 in semen was not
studied. Both PCV2a and PCV2b genotypes were found in isolates from
PCVAD-affected pigs, suggesting that pigs can be infected
simultaneously with both genotypes. However, when isolates from
dually infected pigs were sequenced, only PCV2b was detected. This
observation suggests that the PCV2b genotype is the predominant
population in affected pigs. The PCV2a virus is still present, but
as a much smaller subpopulation. The presence of the two viruses
within a single animal raises the intriguing possibility that the
two PCV2 genotypes may undergo recombination. Studies addressing
co-infection are in progress.
Porcine circovirus type-2 antigen has been found associated with
brain and spinal cord lesions in PCVAD-affected pigs exhibiting
neurological signs.23 However, in this study, we failed
to identify PCV2 in association with the central nervous system
lesions from the Kansas PCVAD-affected pigs. A search for
teschoviruses in one PCVAD-affected pig yielded an isolate that was
closely related to PTV-6. Although PTV-6 is a serogroup 1
enterovirus, it is not known to be associated with porcine
enteroviral encephalomyelitis or Talfan disease as is PTV serogroup
1, serotype 1 (formerly PEV-1).24,25 The rare detection
of PEV in clinical samples by PCR was judged not to be important in
this instance. Additionally, isolations carried out in porcine
kidney-15 cells resulted in no other viruses that were consistently
detected among PCVAD-affected pigs. Overall, the contribution of
teschoviruses and enteroviruses to PCVAD remains unclear. Multiple
viruses have been implicated in PCVAD, and PTV may be only one of
several contributing co-factors.
Since this study began, an additional six herds in the same
geographical area have been diagnosed with severe PCVAD.
Genotype-specific PCR has confirmed the presence of PCV2b in all
affected herds (unpublished data). While many of the newly affected
herds share genetic sources with Farms A, C, and D, not all herds
with these genetic sources exhibit PCVAD. Therefore, the presence
of PCVAD may be the result of introduction of PCV2b into the
nurseries or finishing houses of the affected herds. Another
possibility is that the affected farms may possess a unique
combination of cofactors that works in concert with PCV2b
infection. Elevated mortality and clinical signs of PCVAD have
continued on affected farms and detection of PCV2b has remained
constant. Efforts to control mortality have focused on early
culling of affected pigs and vaccination, as well as implementation
of the Madec 20-Point Plan that includes aspects of biosecurity,
environmental management, and overall health, especially regarding
possible co-infecting agents.26
Implications
- High mortality due to PCVAD in four Kansas herds infected with
a PCV2b strain suggests a greater pathogenic potential in PCV2b
isolates than in PCV2a isolates.
- Nucleotide differences between PCV2a and PCV2b present an
opportunity to develop differential assays to further track PCV2
genotypes.
- As current PCV2 vaccines are based on stimulating capsid
immunity, significant peptide differences between PCV2a and PCV2b
capsid proteins might have implications on the immunological
cross-protective capability of single-strain commercial
vaccines.
- Even though PTV was found both in PCVAD-positive and
PCVAD-negative pigs, it may represent a cofactor in disease
development, particularly with respect to atypical clinical signs
such as neurological disease.
References
1. Allan GM, Ellis JA. Porcine circovirus: a review. J Vet
Diagn Invest. 2000;12:3–14.
2. Segales J, Allan GM, Domingo M. Porcine circovirus associated
diseases. Anim Health Res Rev. 2005;6:119–142.
*3. Clark EG. Post-weaning multisystemic wasting syndrome.
Proc AASP. Quebec, Canada. 1997;499–501.
4. Chadd SA. The characteristics and attempted control of
post-weaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) and porcine
dermatitis and nephropathy syndromes (PDNS) in European pig herds
– a review. Pig J. 2003;51:13–25.
5. Wellenber GJ, Stockhofe-Zurwieden N, de Jong MF, Boersma WJA,
Elbers ARW. Excessive porcine circovirus type 2 antibody titers may
trigger the development of porcine dermatitis and nephropathy
syndrome: a case-control study. Vet Microbiol.
2004;99:203–214.
6. Fenaux M, Halbur PG, Gill M, Toth TE, Meng X. Genetic
characterization of type 2 porcine circovirus (PCV-2) from pigs
with postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome in different
geographic regions of North America and development of a
differential PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay to
detect and differentiate between infections with PCV-1 and PCV-2.
J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:2494–2503.
7. de Boisseson C, Beven V, Bigarre L, Thiery R, Rose N, Eveno
E, Madec F, Jestin A. Molecular characterization of porcine
circovirus type 2 isolates from post-weaning multisystemic wasting
syndrome-affected and non-affected pigs. J Gen Virol.
2004;85:293–304.
*8. Ellis JA, Harding J, Gangon C, Hamel A. Porcine circovirus
associated disease in Canada: A circle within a wheel. Proc
IPVS. Copenhagen, Denmark. 2006;23–34.
9. Meehan BM, McNeilly F, Todd D, Kennedy S, Jewhurst VA, Ellis
JA, Hassard LE, Clark EG, Haines DM, Allan GM. Characterization of
novel circovirus DNAs associated with wasting syndromes in pigs.
J Gen Virol. 1998;79:2171–2179.
10. Krakowka S, Ellis JA, Meehan B, Kennedy S, McNeilly F, Allan
G. Viral wasting syndrome of swine: experimental reproduction of
postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome in gnotobiotic swine by
coinfection with porcine circovirus 2 and porcine parvovirus.
Vet Pathol. 2000;37:254–263.
11. Harms PA, Sorden SD, Halbur PG, Bolin SR, Lager KM, Morozov
I, Paul PS. Experimental reproduction of severe disease in CD/CD
pigs concurrently infected with type 2 porcine circovirus and
porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Vet
Pathol. 2001;38:528–539.
12. Opriessnig T, Thacker EL, Yu S, Fenaux M, Meng XJ, Halbur
PG. Experimantal reproduction of postweaning multisystemic wasting
syndrome in pigs by dual infection with Mycoplasma
hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus type 2. Vet Pathol.
2004;41:624–640.
13. Sorden SD. Update on porcine circovirus and postweaning
multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS). Swine Health Prod.
2000;8:133–136.
14. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. MEGA: molecular evolutionary
genetics analysis software for microcomputers. Comput Appl
Biosci. 1994;10:189–191.
15. Kim J, Choi C, Han DU, Chae C. Simultaneous detection of
porcine circovirus type 2 and porcine parvovirus in pigs with PMWS
by multiplex PCR. Vet Rec. 2001;149:304–305.
16. Larochelle R, Bielanski A, Muller P, Magar R. PCR detection
and evidence of shedding of porcine circovirus type 2 in boar
semen. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;12:4629–4632.
17. Palmquist JM, Munir S, Taku A, Kapur V, Goyal SM. Detection
of porcine teschovirus and enterovirus type II by reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction. J Vet Diagn Invest.
2002;14:467–480.
*18. Carmen S, McEwen B, DeLay J, Cai H, Fairles J. Porcine
circovirus type 2-associated disease continued from fall of 2005.
AHL Newsletter. 2006;10(1):6. Available at http://www.labservices.uoguelph.ca/units/ahl/documents/ANwsl10-1.pdf.
Accessed 4 Apr 2007.
*19. Delay J, McEwen B, Carmen S, van Dreumel T, Fairles J.
Porcine circovirus type 2-associated disease is increasing. AHL
Newsletter. 2005;9(3):22. Available at http://www.labservices.uoguelph.ca/units/ahl/files/ANwsl9-3.pdf.
Accessed 4 Apr 2007.
*20. Tremblay D, Fontaine G, Harel J, Elahi MS, Gagnon CA.
Genetic characterization of porcine circovirus type 2 from pigs
showing signs of post-weaning multisystemic wasting syndrome.
Unpublished. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nucleotide&val=78172609.
Accessed 1 May 2007.
21. Nawagitul P, Morozov I, Bolin SR, Harms PA, Sorden SD, Paul
PS. Open reading frame 2 of porcine circovirus type 2 encodes a
major capsid protein. J Gen Virol.
2000;81:2281–2287.
22. Cheung AK. Transcriptional analysis of porcine circovirus.
J Virol. 2003;305:168–180.
23. Fenaux M, Halbur PG, Haqshenas G, Royer R, Thomas P,
Nawagitgul P, Gill M, Toth TE, Meng XJ. Cloned genomic DNA of type
2 porcine circovirus is infectious when injected directly into the
liver and lymph nodes of pigs: characterization of clinical
disease, virus distribution, and pathologic lesions. J
Virol. 2002;76:541–551.
24. Yamada M, Kozakura R, Ikegami R, Nakamura K, Kaku Y, Yoshii
M, Haritani M. Enterovirus encephalomyelitis in pigs in Japan
caused by porcine teschovirus. Vet Rec.
2004;155:304–306.
25. Kaku Y, Sarai A, Murakami Y. Genetic reclassification of
porcine enterovirus. J Gen Virol. 2001;82:417–424.
*26. National Pork Board. A Producers Guide to Managing PCVAD.
Available at http://www.pork.org/PorkScience/Documents/PCVADBrochure.pdf.
Accessed 2 May 2007.
* Non-refereed references.
|
|